ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

ダブル機械学習×異質的処置効果(CATE / メタ学習器)×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Machine learningRegression model
提唱年20182018
提唱者Victor Chernozhukov et al.Wager & Athey (causal forest); Künzel et al. (meta-learners)
種類Semiparametric causal estimationCausal machine-learning framework
原典Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., & Robins, J. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1–C68. DOI ↗Wager, S. & Athey, S. (2018). Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests. Journal of the American Statistical Association. DOI ↗
別名Debiased Machine Learning, Neyman Orthogonal Score Estimation, Partialing-Out Lasso, Çift Makine Öğrenmesiconditional average treatment effect, CATE, meta-learners, causal forest
関連35
概要Double/Debiased Machine Learning (DML), introduced by Chernozhukov et al. (2018), is a semiparametric framework for estimating causal or structural parameters in the presence of high-dimensional controls. It uses flexible machine learning methods to model nuisance functions—the conditional expectations of the outcome and the treatment given covariates—and then constructs a debiased estimator of the target parameter that achieves root-n consistency and valid inference despite the regularization bias inherent in high-dimensional settings.Heterogeneous Treatment Effects is a machine-learning framework that estimates how a treatment effect varies across individuals — the conditional average treatment effect (CATE). It bundles meta-learner strategies such as the T-Learner, S-Learner, X-Learner and R-Learner alongside the causal forest of Wager and Athey (2018) and Künzel et al. (2019).
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Double Machine Learning · Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare