手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 用量反応分析× | 生態学的研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 疫学 | 疫学 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | Conceptual roots 16th century; modern epidemiological application mid-20th century | 19th century (Snow 1854); formalised mid-20th century |
| 提唱者≠ | Paracelsus (conceptual foundation); formalized by John Snow and later Bradford Hill | Various; foundational work by John Snow (1854) and systematised in modern form by Brian MacMahon and colleagues |
| 種類≠ | Quantitative analytical method | Observational epidemiological study |
| 原典≠ | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641 | Morgenstern, H. (1995). Ecologic studies in epidemiology: concepts, principles, and methods. Annual Review of Public Health, 16(1), 61–81. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | exposure-response analysis, concentration-response modeling, dose-response modeling, DRA | aggregate study, correlational study, ecological correlation study, population-level study |
| 関連≠ | 4 | 5 |
| 概要≠ | Dose-response analysis quantifies the relationship between the magnitude of an exposure (the dose) and the probability or rate of an outcome (the response). It is a core analytical strategy in epidemiology and toxicology, providing evidence that increasing exposure systematically increases — or decreases — the risk of disease. A demonstrated dose-response gradient is one of Bradford Hill's classic criteria supporting causal inference. | An ecological study is an observational epidemiological design in which the unit of analysis is a group or population — a country, region, city, or time period — rather than an individual. Exposures and outcomes are measured as aggregates (rates, proportions, or means) and then correlated across groups to generate or evaluate hypotheses about population-level associations between risk factors and disease. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|