ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

文書収集×談話分析×
分野調査方法論質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000s1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
提唱者Rooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn BowenNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
種類Qualitative / mixed data-collection techniqueMethod
原典Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗
別名document analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysisDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
関連32
概要Document collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Document Collection · Discourse Analysis. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare