手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 二重正規化に基づく複数集約× | 基準相互相関による基準重要度 (CRITIC)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 意思決定 | 意思決定 |
| 系統 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 提唱年≠ | 2020 | 1995 |
| 提唱者≠ | Liao, H., Wu, X. | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. |
| 種類≠ | Dual-normalisation aggregation (linear + vector) | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting |
| 原典≠ | Liao, H., Wu, X. (2020). DNMA: A double normalization-based multiple aggregation method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Omega DOI ↗ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | — | — |
| 関連 | 8 | 8 |
| 概要≠ | DNMA (Double Normalization-Based Multiple Aggregation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Liao, H., Wu, X. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|