ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

二重正規化に基づく複数集約×Analytic Network Process (フィードバックと相互依存性を考慮したAHP)×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年20201996
提唱者Liao, H., Wu, X.Saaty, T. L.
種類Dual-normalisation aggregation (linear + vector)Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)
原典Liao, H., Wu, X. (2020). DNMA: A double normalization-based multiple aggregation method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Omega DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8
別名
関連88
概要DNMA (Double Normalization-Based Multiple Aggregation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Liao, H., Wu, X. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: DNMA · ANP. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare