ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

ディスエンフランチャイズド・グリーフ・スケール×Texas Revised Inventory of Grief×
分野悲嘆心理学悲嘆心理学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年20021987
提唱者Kenneth J. DokaThomas R. Faschingbauer, Sidney Zisook, Richard DeVaul
種類Self-report questionnaireSelf-report questionnaire
原典Doka, K. J. (Ed.). (2002). Disenfranchised grief: New directions, challenges, and strategies for practice. Research Press. link ↗Faschingbauer, T. R., Zisook, S., & DeVaul, R. (1987). The Texas Revised Inventory of Grief. In S. Zisook (Ed.), Biopsychosocial aspects of bereavement (pp. 111–124). American Psychiatric Press. link ↗
別名DGS, Doka Disenfranchised GriefTRIG, Faschingbauer TRIG, Revised Inventory of Grief
関連44
概要The Disenfranchised Grief Scale (DGS), developed from Kenneth J. Doka's conceptual framework, assesses grief that society does not recognize, validate, or support—grief that is excluded from public mourning rituals, openly acknowledged grief ceremonies, or institutional support. Examples include loss of a former spouse, affair partner, ex-partner, friend (not family), pet, or pregnancy loss. The DGS captures the unique burden of grieving without social permission or recognition.The Texas Revised Inventory of Grief (TRIG) is a 21-item multidimensional measure developed by Faschingbauer, Zisook, and DeVaul in 1987 to assess both past grief behaviors (how the person grieved when the death occurred) and present grief feelings (current emotional response to loss). The TRIG is unique in distinguishing historical grief response from contemporary grief state, providing a comprehensive temporal and dimensional profile of bereavement.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: DGS · TRIG. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare