ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Discourse Completion Task×コンテンツ分析×Matched-Guise Technique×Variationist Sociolinguistics×
分野言語学質的手法言語学言語学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1989Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 201819601972
提唱者Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper (CCSARP project)Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications researchWallace Lambert and colleaguesWilliam Labov
種類Written/oral elicitation instrument for speech-act dataQualitative / mixed-method research techniqueIndirect experimental measure of language attitudesQuantitative field study of socially conditioned linguistic variation
原典Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.) (1989). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Ablex Publishing. ISBN: 9780893915131Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C., & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(1), 44–51. DOI ↗Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN: 9780812210521
別名Discourse Completion Test, DCT, Production Questionnaireİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysisMatched Guise Test, Matched-Guise Experiment, Language Attitude Matched GuiseVariationist Analysis, Labovian Sociolinguistics, Quantitative Sociolinguistics
関連3524
概要The discourse completion task (DCT) is an elicitation instrument widely used in pragmatics to gather data on how people perform speech acts such as requests, apologies, refusals, and compliments. Respondents read short descriptions of situations and write (or say) what they would utter in each, allowing researchers to collect comparable speech-act data across many speakers, languages, and cultures under controlled conditions. It was popularized by the Cross-Cultural Speech Act Realization Project (CCSARP) of Blum-Kulka, House, and Kasper in 1989.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.The matched-guise technique is an indirect experimental method for measuring attitudes toward languages, dialects, and accents. Developed by Wallace Lambert and colleagues in 1960, it has the same bilingual or bidialectal speaker record the same passage in two or more language varieties ('guises'); listeners, believing they are hearing different speakers, rate each recording on personality and status traits. Because the voice, content, and delivery are held constant, any differences in the ratings can be attributed to listeners' attitudes toward the variety itself.Variationist sociolinguistics is the quantitative study of how linguistic variation is structured by social and linguistic factors. Pioneered by William Labov in the 1960s and 1970s, it treats alternative ways of saying the same thing — the 'linguistic variable' — as systematically conditioned by speaker characteristics (class, age, sex, ethnicity), stylistic context, and the surrounding linguistic environment, and it uses statistical modeling of natural speech to reveal the orderly heterogeneity beneath apparent randomness.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Discourse Completion Task · Content Analysis · Matched-Guise Technique · Variationist Sociolinguistics. 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare