手法を比較

	Disability Critical Discourse Analysis	Capability Approach to Disability
分野	Disability Studies	Disability Studies
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	2015	2006
提唱者	Jan Grue	Sophie Mitra (building on Amartya Sen)
種類	Critical-discourse-analytic method applied to disability	Conceptual framework operationalized for disability measurement
原典	Grue, J. (2015). Disability and Discourse Analysis (Interdisciplinary Disability Studies). Farnham: Ashgate. ISBN: 9781472432926	Mitra, S. (2006). The Capability Approach and Disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16(4), 236-247.
別名	Disability Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Analysis of Disability, Disability CDA, Discourse Analysis of Disability Representation	Capability Approach and Disability, Capability Model of Disability, Sen Capability Approach for Disability, Capability Deprivation Analysis of Disability
関連	3	3
概要	Disability critical discourse analysis applies the tools of critical discourse analysis (CDA) to disability, treating disability as a phenomenon that is constructed in and through language. Set out systematically in Jan Grue's 2015 book Disability and Discourse Analysis, the method brings together disability studies and CDA to examine how texts and talk — in media, politics, clinical settings, and everyday life — construe disability, position disabled people, and naturalize particular understandings (deficit, tragedy, rights) through specific linguistic choices. Its distinctive claim is that the language used to talk about disability is not a neutral description of a prior reality but part of how disability is socially produced and contested.	The capability approach to disability, articulated by Sophie Mitra in 2006 by adapting Amartya Sen's capability framework, defines disability as a deprivation of capabilities or functionings that arises from the interaction between a person's characteristics (including impairment), their resources, and the personal, social, and environmental conversion factors that turn resources into real opportunities. Rather than locating disability in the body (the medical model) or solely in society (the strong social model), it locates disability in the gap between what a person is actually able to do and be and what they could do and be. This reframing gives disability studies a measurement-friendly account that distinguishes potential from actual disability.