ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

デジタル質的コンテンツ分析×談話分析×
分野質的手法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年2010s (building on qualitative content analysis traditions from 1983–2012)1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
提唱者Adapted from Philipp Mayring and Margrit Schreier; digital extension by multiple scholars in the 2010sNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
種類Qualitative research methodMethod
原典Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage. ISBN: 978-0857029485Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗
別名DQCA, qualitative content analysis of digital data, online qualitative content analysis, digital QCADA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
関連42
概要Digital Qualitative Content Analysis (DQCA) is a systematic method for interpreting meaning from digital texts — social media posts, forum threads, blogs, emails, and other online content — through a structured, category-driven coding process. It extends the established tradition of qualitative content analysis (Mayring; Schreier) to the scale, multimodality, and contextual specificity of digital environments, prioritising interpretive depth over frequency counting.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Digital Qualitative Content Analysis · Discourse Analysis. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare