ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

デジタル現象学×解釈的現象学×
分野質的手法質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年2000s–2010s1927 (Heidegger); systematised for human sciences by van Manen in 1990
提唱者Emerging from classical phenomenology (Husserl, Heidegger) applied to digital contexts; synthesised by scholars such as Sarah Pink and Mark D. VagleMartin Heidegger (philosophical foundation); Max van Manen (methodological systematisation)
種類Qualitative research approachQualitative interpretive research design
原典Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. Sage. ISBN: 978-1446200476van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404645
別名online phenomenology, virtual phenomenology, phenomenology of digital experience, digitally-mediated phenomenologyhermeneutic phenomenology, van Manen phenomenology, Heideggerian phenomenology, interpretive phenomenological inquiry
関連65
概要Digital Phenomenology is a qualitative research approach that applies phenomenological inquiry to lived experiences mediated by or situated within digital environments — including social media platforms, virtual communities, online spaces, and interactions with digital technologies. It asks how people experience, make meaning of, and embody their encounters with digital tools and online worlds, using the interpretive and descriptive rigour of classical phenomenology in settings where much or all of the experience unfolds online.Interpretive phenomenology is a qualitative research design that investigates the meaning people attribute to their lived experiences by combining phenomenological description with hermeneutic interpretation. Rooted in Heidegger's ontology and systematised for social and human sciences by Max van Manen, it moves beyond description to ask what an experience means within a person's broader lifeworld, cultural context, and situated understanding. The researcher's own interpretive horizon is treated as an analytical resource rather than a bias to eliminate.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Digital Phenomenology · Interpretive phenomenology. 2026-06-20に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare