手法を比較

	Digital Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis	デジタル解釈学的現象学
分野	質的手法	質的手法
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	IPA founded ~1996; digital variant established practice ~2010–2020	2000s–2010s (digital adaptation of van Manen's 1990 framework)
提唱者	Jonathan A. Smith (IPA); adapted to digital contexts by qualitative internet researchers from ~2010s onward	Grounded in Max van Manen's hermeneutic phenomenology; digital adaptation developed by qualitative researchers from the 2000s onward
種類	Qualitative research design and analytic approach	Qualitative research design
原典	Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-1412908344	van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404737
別名	Digital IPA, online IPA, digital-mediated IPA, internet-based interpretive phenomenological analysis	online hermeneutic phenomenology, digital HP, web-based hermeneutic phenomenology, virtual hermeneutic phenomenology
関連	5	6
概要	Digital Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (Digital IPA) applies the rigorous IPA framework — originally developed by Jonathan Smith to explore how individuals make sense of significant lived experiences — within digital data-collection environments. Participants are recruited and interviewed online (via video call, synchronous text chat, email, or digital diary), and the resulting transcripts and digital texts are analysed through the same close-reading, emergent-coding, and cross-case patterning procedures that define standard IPA. The digital setting both expands access to geographically dispersed or hard-to-reach participants and introduces distinct methodological considerations around rapport, embodied cues, and data authenticity.	Digital Hermeneutic Phenomenology applies van Manen's hermeneutic phenomenological tradition to phenomena that are lived, shaped, or mediated through digital technologies and online environments. Rather than treating the digital channel as a mere convenience for data collection, this approach treats participants' online experiences as phenomena worthy of interpretive inquiry in their own right — asking what it means to live, relate, learn, or work in and through digital spaces.