手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| デジタル・クラシック・グラウンデッド・セオリー× | 古典的グラウンデッド・セオリー× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1967 (classic GT); digital adaptation from early 2000s onward | 1967 |
| 提唱者≠ | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss (classic GT); digital application developed by subsequent methodologists | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| 原典 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202300283 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| 別名 | Digital CGT, online classic grounded theory, Glaserian digital grounded theory, classic GT in digital contexts | Glaserian GT, CGT, original grounded theory, classic GT |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Digital Classic Grounded Theory applies Glaser and Strauss's original (Glaserian) grounded theory methodology to data collected from online and digital environments — including social media, online forums, email threads, and chat logs. It preserves the inductive, emergence-focused logic of classic GT while adapting sampling, data collection, and ethical practices to the digital context, aiming to generate a grounded substantive theory that explains a social or psychological process as it unfolds online. | Classic Grounded Theory (CGT) is a systematic qualitative methodology for generating substantive theory from empirical data. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, it uses iterative cycles of data collection, constant comparison, and memo writing to produce a core category and surrounding conceptual framework that explains a social or psychological process. Unlike its later variants, Glaserian CGT insists on emergence — theory must arise from data without forcing preconceived frameworks. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|