手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 項目応答理論における項目特性曲線（ICC）の差× | 測定不変性テスト× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 心理測定学 | 心理測定学 |
| 系統 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 提唱年≠ | 1970s–1993 | 2000 |
| 提唱者≠ | William H. Angoff and colleagues (ETS); systematized by Holland & Wainer | Vandenberg & Lance |
| 種類≠ | Item-level bias detection | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis procedure |
| 原典≠ | Holland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (Eds.) (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805809589 | Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | DIF, item bias analysis, measurement non-equivalence, item-level measurement bias | Factorial Invariance, Measurement Equivalence, Configural-Metric-Scalar Testing, Ölçüm Değişmezliği |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Differential item functioning identifies test or survey items that behave differently for examinees from different groups — such as gender, ethnicity, or language background — after controlling for the underlying ability or trait being measured. DIF analysis is essential for fairness evaluation in educational testing and psychological scale development. | Measurement invariance testing is a sequence of nested confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models that examines whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across distinct groups or time points. Systematized and popularized by Vandenberg and Lance (2000), the procedure tests a hierarchy of constraints — from identical factor patterns to identical item intercepts — so that researchers can justify meaningful group comparisons on latent means. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|