ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

順位付けされた基準間の相互関係の定義×加法比率評価×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年20212010
提唱者Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Marinković, D., Doljanica, D.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
種類Ranked criteria interrelationship weighting (non-pairwise sequential)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
原典Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Marinković, D., Doljanica, D. (2021). Development of an alternative approach for the selection of suppliers under the conditions of fuzzy sets. Symmetry link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
別名
関連88
概要DIBR (Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked criteria) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Marinković, D., Doljanica, D. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: DIBR · ARAS. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare