ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Delphi Method×加法比率評価×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年19632010
提唱者Dalkey, N., Helmer, O.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
種類Weight_Subjective (expert consensus, iterative Likert/ranking)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
原典Dalkey, N., Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
別名
関連88
概要DELPHI (Delphi Method — iterative expert consensus for criterion importance elicitation) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Dalkey, N., Helmer, O. in 1963. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: DELPHI · ARAS. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare