ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

欠陥予測モデル×ソフトウェア複雑性メトリクス×
分野ソフトウェア工学ソフトウェア工学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年20051976
提唱者Thomas Ostrand, Elaine Weyuker, Robert BellThomas J. McCabe
種類machine learning modelquantitative measurement
原典Ostrand, T. J., Weyuker, E. J., & Bell, R. M. (2005). Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(4), 340–355. DOI ↗McCabe, T. J. (1976). A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2(4), 308–320. DOI ↗
別名fault prediction, bug prediction, defect classificationcode complexity analysis, complexity measurement
関連44
概要Defect prediction models forecast the likelihood of software faults in code modules using statistical or machine learning approaches. Pioneered by Ostrand, Weyuker, and Bell (2005), these models correlate code metrics (complexity, churn, coupling) with historical defect data to identify high-risk components. Organizations use predictions to allocate testing resources, guide code review, and prioritize refactoring.Software complexity metrics quantify the structural and operational difficulty of code through numerical measurements. Introduced by Thomas McCabe in 1976, cyclomatic complexity became the foundational approach. These metrics assess maintainability, testability, and defect risk, enabling teams to identify problematic code regions and guide refactoring efforts.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Defect Prediction Model · Software Complexity Metrics. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare