手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 意思決定葛藤尺度× | 患者エンパワーメント尺度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 患者中心ケア | 患者中心ケア |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1995 | 1998 |
| 提唱者≠ | Annette O'Connor | J. G. Howie |
| 種類 | Patient-reported | Patient-reported |
| 原典≠ | O'Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making, 15(1), 25-30. DOI ↗ | Howie, J. G., Heaney, D. J., Maxwell, M., & Zwanenberg, D. (1998). A comparison of a Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) against two other consultations outcome measures. British Journal of General Practice, 48(427), 1211-1216. link ↗ |
| 別名 | DCS-16, Decisional Conflict Inventory | PEI, Patient Enablement Score |
| 関連 | 4 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) is a 16-item self-reported outcome measure that quantifies the degree of uncertainty, value ambivalence, and decision distress experienced by patients facing healthcare choices. Developed by Annette O'Connor in 1995, the DCS assesses five core domains: personal uncertainty, understanding of options and outcomes, clarity of personal values, perceived social support, and confidence in making the decision. It has become the gold standard for measuring decisional conflict in healthcare research and clinical trials of decision support interventions. | The Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) is a brief, validated six-item questionnaire that measures the degree to which a clinical consultation leaves the patient feeling more capable of understanding and managing their health condition. Developed by Howie and colleagues in 1998, the PEI assesses whether the consultation helped the patient understand their problem, cope with their illness, and manage their health more effectively. The scale captures the empowering effect of good clinical practice and is widely used in general practice research, quality improvement, and studies evaluating patient-centered and collaborative consultation styles. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|