ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

D数(デングの証拠理論)に基づく修正TOPSIS×CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System)×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年20162025
提唱者Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y.Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N.
種類D-Number ranking — D:Ω→[0,1] with Σ_{B⊆Ω} D(B) ≤ 1; incomplete evidence allowed (Deng 2012)Impact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis)
原典Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. (2016). A Modified TOPSIS Method Based on D Numbers and Its Applications in Human Resources Selection. Mathematical Problems in Engineering link ↗Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗
別名
関連88
概要D-TOPSIS (Modified TOPSIS based on D-Numbers (Deng Evidence Theory)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Fei, L., Hu, Y., Xiao, F., Chen, L., Deng, Y. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: D-TOPSIS · CIMAS. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare