ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

立方体EDAS×基準インパクト損失客観重み付け法×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年20232016
提唱者Paul, T.K., Jana, C., Pal, M.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
種類Cubic Pythagorean Fuzzy ranking — CuPyFN = ⟨IvPyFN, PyFN⟩ = (⟨[Y⁻,Y⁺],[F⁻,F⁺]⟩,⟨Y,F⟩); Pythagorean constraint (Y⁺)²+(F⁺)² ≤ 1; average-solution EDAS with score-function PDA/NDARelative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
原典Paul, T.K., Jana, C., Pal, M. (2023). Multi-criteria group decision-making method in disposal of municipal solid waste based on cubic Pythagorean fuzzy EDAS approach with incomplete weight information. Applied Soft Computing DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
別名
関連88
概要CUBIC-EDAS (Cubic-EDAS — Cubic Pythagorean Fuzzy EDAS (CuP-EDAS)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Paul, T.K., Jana, C., Pal, M. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: CUBIC-EDAS · CILOS. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare