ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

クリティカル・テーマ分析(CTA):権力に着目した質的探求×反射的テーマティック・アナリシス×
分野質的手法質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年2000s–2010s (consolidation as named variant)2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
提唱者Draws on Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis, 2006) combined with critical theory traditions (Frankfurt School, feminist and postcolonial theorists)Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
種類Qualitative analysis approachQualitative research method
原典Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
別名CTA, critical-theoretic thematic analysis, thematic analysis with critical lens, critical qualitative thematic inquiryRTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
関連56
概要Critical thematic analysis (CTA) is a qualitative approach that combines the systematic coding procedures of Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis with the interrogative stance of critical theory. Rather than merely describing patterns in data, CTA asks whose interests those patterns serve, what power relations they reflect, and what is absent or silenced. It is used to surface ideology, structural inequality, and hegemonic assumptions embedded in participants' accounts or in texts.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Critical Thematic Analysis · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare