ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

クリティカル・テーマ分析(CTA):権力に着目した質的探求×フェミニスト研究方法論×
分野質的手法質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年2000s–2010s (consolidation as named variant)1970s–1980s (formalized as a methodology)
提唱者Draws on Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke (thematic analysis, 2006) combined with critical theory traditions (Frankfurt School, feminist and postcolonial theorists)Sandra Harding, Dorothy Smith, Patricia Hill Collins, and the broader feminist social science movement
種類Qualitative analysis approachQualitative research method
原典Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. Indiana University Press. link ↗
別名CTA, critical-theoretic thematic analysis, thematic analysis with critical lens, critical qualitative thematic inquiryfeminist inquiry, feminist qualitative research, feminist standpoint research, gender-critical research
関連56
概要Critical thematic analysis (CTA) is a qualitative approach that combines the systematic coding procedures of Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis with the interrogative stance of critical theory. Rather than merely describing patterns in data, CTA asks whose interests those patterns serve, what power relations they reflect, and what is absent or silenced. It is used to surface ideology, structural inequality, and hegemonic assumptions embedded in participants' accounts or in texts.Feminist research methodology is a qualitative approach grounded in feminist theory that centres gender, power, and social justice as core analytical lenses. It challenges claims of value-free objectivity, foregrounds the voices and experiences of marginalized groups — particularly women — and explicitly positions the researcher as a political and social actor. Developed across disciplines including sociology, education, and health sciences, it draws on standpoint theory, intersectionality, and participatory ethics to produce knowledge that can inform emancipatory practice.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Critical Thematic Analysis · Feminist Research Methodology. 2026-06-20に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare