ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

クリティカル・プログラム評価×参加型プログラム評価×
分野フィールド調査法フィールド調査法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1970s–1990s (deliberative democratic strand formalised ~1999; transformative paradigm ~2009)1992 (formal articulation); roots in participatory action research of the 1970s–1980s
提唱者Ernest House, Ken Howe, Donna Mertens (transformative/deliberative democratic evaluation traditions)J. Bradley Cousins & Lorna Earl (formalization); Michael Q. Patton (utilization-focused lineage)
種類Qualitative/mixed-methods evaluation approachApplied evaluation approach
原典Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative Research and Evaluation. Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1606230787Cousins, J. B., & Earl, L. M. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(4), 397–418. DOI ↗
別名critical evaluation, emancipatory evaluation, critical-emancipatory program evaluation, transformative evaluationparticipatory evaluation, collaborative evaluation, PE, stakeholder-involved evaluation
関連43
概要Critical program evaluation is an approach to assessing programs that integrates critical theory with standard evaluation methods. It moves beyond measuring whether a program met its stated objectives to interrogating whose interests the program serves, how power and privilege shape its design and outcomes, and whether it advances or hinders equity and social justice. The approach draws on deliberative democratic evaluation (House and Howe) and the transformative paradigm (Mertens), treating evaluation as an inherently value-laden, politically situated practice.Participatory program evaluation is an applied evaluation approach in which program stakeholders — staff, participants, funders, or community members — are actively involved as co-evaluators rather than passive subjects. By engaging those closest to the program in designing questions, collecting data, and interpreting findings, the approach aims to increase both the quality of the evaluation and the likelihood that findings will be understood, owned, and acted upon.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Critical Program Evaluation · Participatory Program Evaluation. 2026-06-15に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare