ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

批判的メタファー分析×批判的談話分析×
分野質的手法質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年2004Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
提唱者Jonathan Charteris-BlackNorman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
種類Qualitative-critical textual analysisQualitative research method
原典Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 978-1403932921Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗
別名CMA, critical metaphor research, corpus-based critical metaphor analysis, ideological metaphor analysisCDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
関連56
概要Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) is a qualitative method for uncovering how metaphorical language constructs, legitimises, or contests power relations and ideological positions in texts. Developed by Jonathan Charteris-Black (2004), it integrates Conceptual Metaphor Theory with the evaluative concerns of Critical Discourse Analysis to reveal the persuasive and ideological work performed by metaphors in political, institutional, and media discourse.Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Critical Metaphor Analysis · Critical Discourse Analysis. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare