ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

批判的メタファー分析×批判的コンテンツ分析×
分野質的手法質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年20041980s–2000s (consolidated in practice by the 1990s–2000s)
提唱者Jonathan Charteris-BlackBuilding on Krippendorff (1980) and Altheide (1996); synthesised through critical theory traditions (Frankfurt School, feminist and race critical scholars)
種類Qualitative-critical textual analysisQualitative analytical approach
原典Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 978-1403932921Altheide, D. L. (1996). Qualitative Media Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803970892
別名CMA, critical metaphor research, corpus-based critical metaphor analysis, ideological metaphor analysisCCA, critical textual analysis, ideological content analysis, critical qualitative content analysis
関連55
概要Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) is a qualitative method for uncovering how metaphorical language constructs, legitimises, or contests power relations and ideological positions in texts. Developed by Jonathan Charteris-Black (2004), it integrates Conceptual Metaphor Theory with the evaluative concerns of Critical Discourse Analysis to reveal the persuasive and ideological work performed by metaphors in political, institutional, and media discourse.Critical content analysis is a qualitative approach that examines texts, media, and documents not merely for manifest meaning but for how they construct, reinforce, or contest relations of power, ideology, race, gender, and class. Grounded in critical theory traditions, it asks whose interests a text serves, what voices are silenced, and how language and representation naturalise dominant worldviews. It combines systematic analytic rigour with an explicitly emancipatory or transformative research stance.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Critical Metaphor Analysis · Critical Content Analysis. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare