手法を比較

	クリティカル・ハーメニュート・フェノメノロジー	クリティカル・フェノメノロジー
分野	質的手法	質的手法
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	1960s–1990s (Gadamer 1960; van Manen 1990; critical synthesis developed through 1990s–2000s)	Late 20th–early 21st century (fully articulated ~2000s–2010s)
提唱者	Hans-Georg Gadamer (hermeneutic tradition); Max van Manen (pedagogical application); influenced by Frankfurt School critical theory	Lisa Guenther, Gayle Salamon, Alia Al-Saji (among others); draws on Husserl, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Frankfurt School critical theory
種類	Qualitative research approach	Qualitative research approach — interpretive and emancipatory
原典	van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404645	Guenther, L. (2020). Critical phenomenology. In G. Weiss, A. V. Murphy, & G. Salamon (Eds.), 50 Concepts for a Critical Phenomenology (pp. 11–16). Northwestern University Press. ISBN: 978-0810141018
別名	CHP, critical hermeneutics, critically-oriented hermeneutic phenomenology, hermeneutic phenomenology with critical lens	critical-phenomenological inquiry, critical-phenomenological analysis, phenomenology and critical theory, politically engaged phenomenology
関連	6	6
概要	Critical hermeneutic phenomenology is a qualitative research approach that combines Gadamerian hermeneutics — the philosophical study of interpretation — with critical social theory to examine both the lived meaning of experience and the structural, ideological, and power-laden conditions that shape it. It asks not only 'what is this experience like?' but also 'what historical, social, and political forces produce and constrain it?' The approach is widely used in education, nursing, social work, and the human sciences.	Critical phenomenology is a qualitative research approach that merges classical phenomenological methods with critical theory to examine how structural forces — race, gender, class, disability, and other axes of power — shape and constrain lived experience. Rather than pursuing neutral description of universal essences, it asks whose experiences are centred, whose are marginalised, and how oppressive social structures are reproduced in the body and in everyday life. It has been consolidated as a distinct field by scholars such as Lisa Guenther, Gayle Salamon, and Alia Al-Saji.