手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 批判的解釈学的分析× | ナラティブ分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | フィールド調査法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1970s (Habermas); extended through 1980s–1990s | 1967 (foundational); 2008 (canonical handbook) |
| 提唱者≠ | Jürgen Habermas (critical hermeneutics); Paul Ricoeur (hermeneutics of suspicion) | Catherine Kohler Riessman (seminal synthesis, 2008); roots in Labov & Waletzky (1967) |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative interpretive research approach | Qualitative interpretive method |
| 原典≠ | Habermas, J. (1970). On Systematically Distorted Communication. Inquiry, 13(1–4), 205–218. link ↗ | Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage. link ↗ |
| 別名 | critical hermeneutics, critical-interpretive analysis, emancipatory hermeneutics, CHA | narrative inquiry, life history analysis, biographical research, Anlatı Analizi (Narrative Analysis) |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Critical hermeneutic analysis combines interpretive hermeneutics with critical social theory to read texts and discourse not only for meaning but for embedded power relations, ideological distortions, and structures of domination. Originating in Habermas's critique of Gadamer and developed further by Ricoeur's hermeneutics of suspicion, the method asks both 'what does this text mean?' and 'whose interests does this meaning serve?'. It is widely used in education, social work, policy research, and health humanities. | Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method, synthesised canonically by Catherine Kohler Riessman (2008), that examines how individuals storise their lived experiences and construct meaning through the telling. Drawing on life history, biographical, and narrative inquiry traditions, it treats the story itself — not just its content — as the unit of analysis, attending to temporal sequence, plot structure, and the social context in which a narrative is produced. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|