手法を比較

	批判的コンテンツ分析	批判的談話分析
分野	質的手法	質的手法
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	1980s–2000s (consolidated in practice by the 1990s–2000s)	Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
提唱者	Building on Krippendorff (1980) and Altheide (1996); synthesised through critical theory traditions (Frankfurt School, feminist and race critical scholars)	Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
種類	Qualitative analytical approach	Qualitative research method
原典	Altheide, D. L. (1996). Qualitative Media Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803970892	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
別名	CCA, critical textual analysis, ideological content analysis, critical qualitative content analysis	CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
関連	5	6
概要	Critical content analysis is a qualitative approach that examines texts, media, and documents not merely for manifest meaning but for how they construct, reinforce, or contest relations of power, ideology, race, gender, and class. Grounded in critical theory traditions, it asks whose interests a text serves, what voices are silenced, and how language and representation naturalise dominant worldviews. It combines systematic analytic rigour with an explicitly emancipatory or transformative research stance.	Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.