ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

批判的オートエスノグラフィー×反射的テーマティック・アナリシス×
分野質的手法質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年2000s–2010s (crystallised as named approach ~2012)2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
提唱者Robin M. Boylorn, Mark P. Orbe (editors of foundational volume); D. Soyini Madison (critical ethnography lineage)Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
種類Qualitative research designQualitative research method
原典Madison, D. S. (2005). Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics, and Performance. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761929505Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
別名CAE, critical auto-ethnography, critical self-ethnography, critical performative autoethnographyRTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
関連66
概要Critical autoethnography combines the self-reflective personal narrative of autoethnography with the social-justice orientation of critical theory. The researcher uses their own lived experience as primary data to interrogate power structures, systemic inequalities, and cultural norms — treating the personal not merely as testimony but as a site for political and theoretical critique. It is widely used to center the voices of marginalized groups and challenge dominant social narratives.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Critical Autoethnography · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare