ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

CRITIC-M×Full Consistency Method×基準の除去効果に基づく方法×
分野意思決定意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDMMCDM
提唱年199520182021
提唱者Based on Diakoulaki et al.'s CRITIC; modified variants developed laterPamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S.Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Turskis, Z.
種類Objective weight derivation via correlation and variancePairwise priority + consistency constraint LP weightingRemoval-effect objective weighting (logarithmic utility)
原典Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. DOI ↗Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S. (2018). A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: Full consistency method (FUCOM). Symmetry DOI ↗Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Turskis, Z. (2021). Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC). Informatica DOI ↗
別名CRITIC-M, Modified CRITIC
関連388
概要CRITIC-M (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation - Modified) is an objective weight derivation method that extends the classical CRITIC approach. It assigns weights to criteria based on two intrinsic properties of the decision matrix: variance (how much a criterion differentiates alternatives) and correlation (how much a criterion conflicts with or supplements others). Modified variants adjust the formulation to improve robustness or interpretability.FUCOM (Full Consistency Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.MEREC (MEthod based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Turskis, Z. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: CRITIC-M · FUCOM · MEREC. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare