手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 基準相互相関による基準重要度 (CRITIC)× | 加法比率評価× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 意思決定 | 意思決定 |
| 系統 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 提唱年≠ | 1995 | 2010 |
| 提唱者≠ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| 種類≠ | Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| 原典≠ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| 別名 | — | — |
| 関連 | 8 | 8 |
| 概要≠ | CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|