ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Cosponsorship Network Analysis×コミュニティ検出×
分野Political Scienceネットワーク分析
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年20062002–2019 (algorithm family)
提唱者James H. FowlerLouvain: Blondel et al. (2008); Leiden: Traag et al. (2019); Girvan-Newman: Girvan & Newman (2002); Infomap: Rosvall & Bergstrom (2008)
種類Social-network analysis of legislative collaborationGraph-partitioning / clustering algorithm family
原典Fowler, J. H. (2006). Connecting the Congress: A Study of Cosponsorship Networks. Political Analysis, 14(4), 456–487. DOI ↗Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2008(10), P10008. DOI ↗
別名Cosponsorship networks, Legislative collaboration networks, Bill cosponsorship analysis, Co-sponsorship network analysisgraph clustering, network partitioning, Topluluk Tespiti (Louvain, Girvan-Newman, Leiden)
関連35
概要Cosponsorship network analysis treats legislative collaboration as a social network: when legislators cosponsor one another's bills, they form ties, and the resulting web of connections can be measured with the tools of network science. Introduced to congressional studies by James Fowler in 2006, it turns the public record of who signed on to whose bills into a graph among lawmakers, revealing who is central and influential, how connected the chamber is, and which clusters of legislators form coalitions. With inferential network models such as ERGMs, researchers move from describing the network to explaining why ties form.Community detection is a family of graph-partitioning algorithms that discover densely connected sub-groups — communities — within a network. First formalised through the modularity measure by Girvan and Newman (2002), the field advanced rapidly with the Louvain method (Blondel et al., 2008), the Leiden refinement (Traag et al., 2019), and the information-theoretic Infomap approach. All variants answer the same question: which nodes cluster together more tightly among themselves than with the rest of the network?
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Cosponsorship Network Analysis · Community Detection. 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare