ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Corporatism Analysis×Corporatism Index×
分野Political EconomyPolitical Economy
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19741999
提唱者Philippe C. SchmitterAlan Siaroff & Lane Kenworthy
種類Conceptual-comparative frameworkComposite institutional index
原典Schmitter, P. C. (1974). Still the Century of Corporatism? The Review of Politics, 36(1), 85-131. DOI ↗Siaroff, A. (1999). Corporatism in 24 Industrial Democracies: Meaning and Measurement. European Journal of Political Research, 36(2), 175-205. DOI ↗
別名Neo-Corporatism Analysis, Interest Intermediation Analysis, Concertation Analysis, Corporatism vs Pluralism FrameworkCorporatism Score, Wage Coordination Index, Bargaining Centralization Index, Siaroff Corporatism Index
関連33
概要Corporatism analysis is the conceptual and comparative framework for characterizing how organized interests are represented and incorporated into policymaking, defined classically by Philippe Schmitter's 1974 essay 'Still the Century of Corporatism?'. Schmitter contrasts corporatism — a system in which a limited number of singular, compulsory, non-competitive, hierarchically ordered peak associations are recognized or licensed by the state and granted a representational monopoly in exchange for controlling their members — with pluralism, in which many voluntary, competing, non-hierarchical associations vie for influence. The framework further distinguishes societal from state corporatism and analyzes tripartite concertation among government, labor, and capital.A corporatism index is a quantitative scaling of how centralized and coordinated a country's system of wage bargaining and interest intermediation is. Where the conceptual corporatism framework describes the institutional pattern in which peak associations of labor and capital negotiate with the state, a corporatism index turns that pattern into comparable numbers. The two landmark efforts are Alan Siaroff's 1999 integrated scale for 24 industrial democracies and Lane Kenworthy's 2003 systematic review and reconstruction of the available indicators. Both combine measures such as bargaining centralization, wage-setting coordination, union and employer organizational concentration, and the degree of tripartite concertation into a composite score that ranks countries from pluralist and decentralized at the low end to strongly corporatist and coordinated at the high end.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Corporatism Analysis · Corporatism Index. 2026-06-25に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare