ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

質的コンテンツ分析×談話分析×Thematic Analysis×
分野質的研究質的研究質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19801989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)2006
提唱者Klaus Krippendorff; refined by Margrit SchreierNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret WetherellVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
種類MethodMethodMethod
原典Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications. link ↗Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
別名Content Analysis, Categorical Content AnalysisDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive AnalysisTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
関連223
概要Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) is a systematic, inductive method for analyzing textual or visual data by identifying and categorizing meaning units into content categories. Developed and formalized by Klaus Krippendorff (1980), QCA can be purely qualitative (inductive, exploratory) or combined with quantitative counting; it analyzes manifest content (explicit, surface meanings) and latent content (underlying, interpretive meanings).Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Qualitative Content Analysis · Discourse Analysis · Thematic Analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare