手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 定性比較分析法× | ナラティブ分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1967 | 1967 (foundational); 2008 (canonical handbook) |
| 提唱者≠ | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss | Catherine Kohler Riessman (seminal synthesis, 2008); roots in Labov & Waletzky (1967) |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative research method | Qualitative interpretive method |
| 原典≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗ | Riessman, C.K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Sage. link ↗ |
| 別名 | CCM, constant comparison, constant comparative analysis, comparative constant analysis | narrative inquiry, life history analysis, biographical research, Anlatı Analizi (Narrative Analysis) |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | The Constant Comparative Method (CCM) is a systematic qualitative analysis procedure in which every newly coded incident is immediately compared with all previously coded incidents in the same category. Introduced by Glaser and Strauss in their 1967 grounded theory framework, CCM drives theory development by cycling continuously between data collection and analysis, progressively refining categories until theoretical saturation is reached. Though closely associated with grounded theory, the method has been widely adopted as a stand-alone analytic strategy across qualitative traditions. | Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method, synthesised canonically by Catherine Kohler Riessman (2008), that examines how individuals storise their lived experiences and construct meaning through the telling. Drawing on life history, biographical, and narrative inquiry traditions, it treats the story itself — not just its content — as the unit of analysis, attending to temporal sequence, plot structure, and the social context in which a narrative is produced. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|