手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| Conover-Iman の事後検定× | Nemenyiの事後検定（Friedman検定用）× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 統計学 | 統計学 |
| 系統≠ | Regression model | Hypothesis test |
| 提唱年≠ | 1979 | 1963 |
| 提唱者≠ | Conover & Iman | Peter Nemenyi |
| 種類 | Nonparametric post-hoc multiple comparison | Nonparametric post-hoc multiple comparison |
| 原典≠ | Conover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. (1979). On Multiple-Comparisons Procedures. Technical Report LA-7677-MS, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. link ↗ | Nemenyi, P. (1963). Distribution-Free Multiple Comparisons. PhD thesis, Princeton University. link ↗ |
| 別名 | Conover-Iman post-hoc test, Conover post-hoc test, Conover-Iman Post-Hoc Testi | Nemenyi Testi — Friedman Post-Hoc, Nemenyi multiple comparison test, Nemenyi procedure |
| 関連≠ | 3 | 5 |
| 概要≠ | The Conover-Iman test is a rank-based post-hoc procedure, introduced by Conover and Iman in 1979, that identifies which pairs of groups differ after a significant Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman test. It builds a t-style statistic on the pooled ranks and is generally more powerful than the comparable Dunn test. | The Nemenyi test is a nonparametric post-hoc multiple comparison procedure introduced by Peter Nemenyi in his 1963 Princeton doctoral thesis. It is applied after a significant Friedman test to identify which specific pairs of conditions differ from each other in a repeated-measures or blocked design. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|