ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Conover-Iman の事後検定×Friedman test×
分野統計学統計学
系統Regression modelHypothesis test
提唱年19791937
提唱者Conover & ImanMilton Friedman
種類Nonparametric post-hoc multiple comparisonNonparametric repeated-measures comparison (by ranks)
原典Conover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. (1979). On Multiple-Comparisons Procedures. Technical Report LA-7677-MS, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. link ↗Friedman, M. (1937). The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 32(200), 675–701. DOI ↗
別名Conover-Iman post-hoc test, Conover post-hoc test, Conover-Iman Post-Hoc TestiFriedman two-way analysis of variance by ranks, Friedman rank test, Friedman Testi
関連32
概要The Conover-Iman test is a rank-based post-hoc procedure, introduced by Conover and Iman in 1979, that identifies which pairs of groups differ after a significant Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman test. It builds a t-style statistic on the pooled ranks and is generally more powerful than the comparable Dunn test.The Friedman test is a nonparametric hypothesis test that compares three or more related conditions measured on the same blocks or subjects, serving as the rank-based alternative to repeated-measures ANOVA. It was introduced by Milton Friedman in 1937 and works on ordinal or continuous data without assuming normality.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Conover-Iman Test · Friedman test. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare