ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Conover-Iman の事後検定×Dunn's Multiple Comparison Test×
分野統計学統計学
系統Regression modelHypothesis test
提唱年19791964
提唱者Conover & ImanOlive Jean Dunn
種類Nonparametric post-hoc multiple comparisonNonparametric pairwise comparison
原典Conover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. (1979). On Multiple-Comparisons Procedures. Technical Report LA-7677-MS, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. link ↗Dunn, O.J. (1964). Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. Technometrics, 6(3), 241–252. DOI ↗
別名Conover-Iman post-hoc test, Conover post-hoc test, Conover-Iman Post-Hoc TestiDunn's post-hoc test, Kruskal-Wallis post-hoc, Dunn Testi — Kruskal-Wallis Post-Hoc
関連35
概要The Conover-Iman test is a rank-based post-hoc procedure, introduced by Conover and Iman in 1979, that identifies which pairs of groups differ after a significant Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman test. It builds a t-style statistic on the pooled ranks and is generally more powerful than the comparable Dunn test.Dunn's test is a nonparametric post-hoc procedure introduced by Olive Jean Dunn in 1964 to identify which specific pairs of groups differ significantly after a Kruskal-Wallis test has returned a significant overall result. It compares groups pairwise using rank sums and applies a multiple-comparison correction — most commonly Bonferroni or Holm — to control the family-wise error rate.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Conover-Iman Test · Dunn Test. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare