手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 確認的因子分析（CFA）× | 媒介分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 心理測定学 | 統計学 |
| 系統≠ | Latent structure | Hypothesis test |
| 提唱年≠ | 1969 | 1986 |
| 提唱者≠ | Karl Gustav Jöreskog | Baron & Kenny |
| 種類≠ | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model | Indirect effects / path test |
| 原典≠ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ | Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. link ↗ |
| 別名 | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis | indirect effects analysis, path-based mediation, PROCESS macro mediation, Aracılık Analizi (Mediation / PROCESS) |
| 関連≠ | 4 | 5 |
| 概要≠ | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. | Mediation analysis is a statistical procedure that tests whether the effect of an independent variable X on an outcome Y operates wholly or partly through a third variable M, called the mediator. Formalised by Baron and Kenny in 1986, it decomposes the total effect of X on Y into a direct path (c′) and an indirect path (a × b), quantifying how much of the relationship is carried by the mediating mechanism. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|