ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

確認的因子分析(CFA)×収束的妥当性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年19691959
提唱者Karl Gustav JöreskogDonald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
種類Hypothesis-testing latent variable modelValidity evidence / construct validation
原典Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
別名CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysisconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
関連44
概要Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Confirmatory factor analysis · Convergent Validity. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare