ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

コンピュータ適応型テスト測定不変性×確認的因子分析(CFA)×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1990s–2000s1969
提唱者Building on Meredith (1993) for invariance and Lord (1980) for adaptive testingKarl Gustav Jöreskog
種類Measurement equivalence testing in adaptive testing contextsHypothesis-testing latent variable model
原典Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. Routledge. ISBN: 978-0805864946Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗
別名CAT measurement invariance, adaptive test invariance, CAT MI, measurement equivalence in CATCFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis
関連64
概要Computerized adaptive test measurement invariance evaluates whether a CAT instrument measures the same latent construct with the same psychometric properties across different groups (e.g., gender, language, clinical vs. community) or time points. It combines IRT-based adaptive test frameworks with measurement equivalence testing to ensure fair and comparable score interpretation.Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Computerized adaptive test measurement invariance · Confirmatory factor analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare