ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

コンピュータ化適応型テスト(CAT)における弁別的妥当性×判別妥当性×
分野心理測定学心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年1959 (discriminant validity); CAT application from 1990s onward1959
提唱者Campbell & Fiske (discriminant validity framework); applied to CAT by educational measurement researchersDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
種類Validity evaluation techniqueValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
原典Weiss, D. J. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing for effective and efficient measurement in counseling and education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 37(2), 70–84. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
別名CAT discriminant validity, adaptive test divergent validity, CAT scale differentiation, CAT construct separationdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
関連55
概要Discriminant validity in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) is the evaluation process confirming that a CAT-administered scale measures its intended construct distinctly from related but conceptually different constructs. Despite the adaptive item-selection mechanism varying each respondent's item set, evidence must be provided that CAT-derived scores do not overlap excessively with scores from theoretically distinct scales.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Computerized adaptive test discriminant validity · Discriminant Validity. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare