手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 比較的ストロース型グラウンデッド・セオリー× | 構成主義的グラウンデッド・セオリー× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1967 (discovery); systematic Straussian procedures codified 1990/1998 | 2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967) |
| 提唱者≠ | Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin (Straussian GT); comparative extension built on Glaser & Strauss (1967) | Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967) |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative research method |
| 原典≠ | Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803959408 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| 別名 | Strauss-Corbin comparative GT, comparative systematic grounded theory, multi-site Straussian GT, comparative grounded theory (Straussian) | CGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Comparative Straussian Grounded Theory applies the systematic open–axial–selective coding framework of Strauss and Corbin across two or more purposively selected contexts, groups, or sites to generate theory that explains both within-context processes and cross-context variation. The constant comparative method — the analytic engine first described by Glaser and Strauss (1967) — is elevated to a deliberate design-level strategy, allowing researchers to build mid-range theory that accounts for how social processes unfold differently under varying conditions. | Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|