手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 比較反射的テーマ分析× | 比較事例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2006 (reflexive TA); comparative application formalised ~2019–2021 | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 提唱者≠ | Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative analytic approach | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 原典≠ | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage. ISBN: 978-1473953406 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 別名 | Comparative RTA, cross-group thematic analysis, comparative TA, comparative qualitative thematic comparison | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 関連 | 4 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Comparative Reflexive Thematic Analysis (CRTA) applies Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis framework to data drawn from two or more distinct groups, time points, or contexts, with the explicit goal of contrasting thematic patterns across those groups. The reflexive element means the analyst continuously interrogates how their own perspectives and positioning shape the themes they construct, while the comparative element directs attention to differences and similarities between data sets rather than seeking a single unified account. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|