ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

比較現象学×Thematic Analysis×
分野質的手法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年Late 20th century (comparative applications prominent from the 1980s–1990s onward)2006
提唱者Edmund Husserl (foundational); systematised in comparative application by Amedeo Giorgi, Max van Manen, and othersVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
種類Qualitative comparative research designMethod
原典van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404645Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
別名cross-group phenomenology, multi-group phenomenological study, comparative phenomenological inquiry, contrastive phenomenologyTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
関連43
概要Comparative phenomenology applies phenomenological inquiry to two or more distinct groups, cultures, or contexts, explicitly contrasting how each group lives through and makes meaning of a shared phenomenon. Rather than describing a single unified essence, it reveals both common structures and meaningful differences in lived experience across comparison units. The approach is grounded in Husserlian and hermeneutic phenomenology but extends the standard single-group design into a structured cross-group analysis.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Comparative phenomenology · Thematic Analysis. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare