手法を比較

	比較解釈学的分析	テクスト批評 ― 正統的なテクストの再構築と確立
分野	フィールド調査法	フィールド調査法
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	Mid-20th century (Gadamer 1960; comparative extension developed 1970s–1990s)	Antiquity; modern systematic method c. 1850s (Lachmann)
提唱者	Hans-Georg Gadamer; Paul Ricoeur; Wilhelm Dilthey (hermeneutic tradition); comparative extension by cross-cultural and comparative religion scholars	Classical philologists (Karl Lachmann foremost in systematic method)
種類	Qualitative interpretive method	Humanistic / philological research method
原典	Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and Method (G. Barden & J. Cumming, Trans.). Seabury Press. (Original work published 1960) ISBN: 978-0826400185	West, M. L. (1973). Textual Criticism and Editorial Technique Applicable to Greek and Latin Texts. Teubner. ISBN: 978-3519074014
別名	comparative hermeneutics, cross-textual hermeneutics, comparative interpretive analysis, CHA	lower criticism, editorial criticism, philological criticism, manuscript criticism
関連	5	5
概要	Comparative hermeneutic analysis is a qualitative method that applies hermeneutic interpretation across two or more texts, traditions, or discourses to reveal shared meanings, tensions, and divergences. Drawing on Gadamer's concept of the hermeneutic circle and Ricoeur's theory of text and meaning, it moves iteratively between the parts and the whole of each text while simultaneously holding multiple texts in dialogue, surfacing how different historical, cultural, or disciplinary contexts shape interpretation.	Textual criticism is a systematic philological method for identifying, comparing, and evaluating variant readings across multiple manuscript or print witnesses of a text in order to reconstruct the most accurate version of the original — or the author's intended — text. Applied since antiquity to classical, biblical, and literary works, it remains the foundational editorial method in classical studies, biblical scholarship, medieval studies, and critical editing of literary works.