手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 比較グラウンデッド・セオリー× | 構成主義的グラウンデッド・セオリー× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward | 2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967) |
| 提唱者≠ | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholars | Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967) |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative research method |
| 原典≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| 別名 | cross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysis | CGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Comparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies. | Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|