手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 比較グラウンデッド・セオリー× | 比較民族誌× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward | 1987–1995 (systematic comparative ethnography formalized) |
| 提唱者≠ | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholars | George E. Marcus (multi-sited formulation); Charles C. Ragin (comparative logic) |
| 種類 | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative comparative research design |
| 原典≠ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607 | Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | cross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysis | multi-sited ethnography, cross-site ethnography, comparative field research, comparative participant observation |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Comparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies. | Comparative ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts in-depth ethnographic fieldwork across two or more sites, groups, communities, or cultural settings in order to generate systematic comparisons. Rather than describing a single community in isolation, it traces similarities, differences, and interconnections across cases, producing theoretically grounded insights that no single site could yield alone. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|