ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

比較民族誌×Thematic Analysis×
分野質的手法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1987–1995 (systematic comparative ethnography formalized)2006
提唱者George E. Marcus (multi-sited formulation); Charles C. Ragin (comparative logic)Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
種類Qualitative comparative research designMethod
原典Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. DOI ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
別名multi-sited ethnography, cross-site ethnography, comparative field research, comparative participant observationTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
関連63
概要Comparative ethnography is a qualitative research design that conducts in-depth ethnographic fieldwork across two or more sites, groups, communities, or cultural settings in order to generate systematic comparisons. Rather than describing a single community in isolation, it traces similarities, differences, and interconnections across cases, producing theoretically grounded insights that no single site could yield alone.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Comparative Ethnography · Thematic Analysis. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare