ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

比較会話分析×談話分析×
分野質的手法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1974 (CA foundation); comparative applications from 1980s–1990s1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
提唱者Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundation); comparative extension developed across the field from the 1980s onwardNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
種類Qualitative micro-analytic research designMethod
原典Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. DOI ↗Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗
別名comparative CA, cross-contextual conversation analysis, comparative interactional analysis, comparative talk-in-interactionDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
関連32
概要Comparative Conversation Analysis (comparative CA) applies the rigorous micro-analytic methods of Conversation Analysis across two or more contrasting interactional settings, languages, cultures, or participant groups. It examines how the sequential organisation of talk — turn-taking, repair, adjacency pairs, and action formation — varies or remains stable across contexts, producing cross-contextual evidence about the architecture of human interaction.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Comparative Conversation Analysis · Discourse Analysis. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare