手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 比較構成主義的グラウンデッド・セオリー× | 比較事例研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2000s (Charmaz 2000; extended comparatively through 2006–2014) | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| 提唱者≠ | Kathy Charmaz (constructivist strand); comparative application developed in qualitative methodology literature | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| 原典≠ | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973133 | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| 別名 | Comparative CGT, cross-group constructivist grounded theory, comparative Charmaz grounded theory, multi-site constructivist grounded theory | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Comparative Constructivist Grounded Theory combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist strand of grounded theory with an explicit comparative design, deliberately collecting and analyzing data from two or more groups, settings, or time points to build a theory that accounts for variation and similarity across contexts. The constructivist perspective treats categories and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants rather than discovered objectively from data. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|